The Kerala High Court decision upholding the decision of the
Kerala Government for closure of the bars in two and three star’s hotels in the
state by today evening was on the expected lines. The lobby working for the
closure of the bars was powerful and had built sentimental inroads into every
person who abhors drinking, cutting across party lines. Its vociferous
supporters were women and some activists. Now the Kerala Bar Owners’
Association has to approach the Supreme Court to challenge the verdict.
The Kerala population is divided sharply on the issue. Those supporting the ban ferret out many
reasons to lend credence to their argument. Foremost is the impact it will have
on the house budget since, according to them, a sizeable chunk of the earning
of the male members of the household is spent on the booze. Health hazards, law
and order, domestic violence etc. are the other reasons that point out for
supporting the ban.
On the other side of the spectrum, those who are against the
ban point out that this measure is easier said than implemented. Even now, the
general public can buy and store liquor. Moreover, many of them would start
drinking in private places and the likelihood of brawls and fights will be more
in such places, which are beyond the surveillance of the police authorities. Also, illicit liquor brewing can become
rampant, which are done on most unhygienic conditions.
An objective analysis of the restrictions on liquor trade
ranging from –total ban in state like Gujarat, Tamil Nadu (withdrawn later on
account of the widespread use of illicit liquor) and selective ban in states
like North East did not augur well. Not only the state governments lost huge
revenue, which they would have collected as taxes, there was heavy movement of
people to states where liquor was available. Interestingly, people flock from
one state to the other where liquor prices are low. For instance, in the 1980’s
there were many people going from Delhi to Gurgaon or NOIDA the nearby
satellite cities but in another state-Haryana-to quench their liquor thirst.
What is important is to educate the people about the
pernicious effect of heavy drinking. Apart from boring holes in their pockets
and putting family budget under strain, it will have harmful effect on their
health. How about promoting social drinking? Put it in the context it would
mean: drink moderately if you cannot avoid it totally. Is the message loud and
clear?
0 comments:
Post a Comment