Will the Hunt for Black Money Fall Flat?

Reports are emanating from different quarters about the seriousness of the government to curb the black money.

Will Rajan Idenify Faultlines Before Reducing Interest Rates?

Clamor for interest rate cut is gaining ground day by day. Finance Minister has already lent his moral support for a reduction.

An Economy of Watering Holes

The Kerala High Court decision upholding the decision of the Kerala Government for closure of the bars in two and three star’s hotels in the state by today evening was on the expected lines.

Cabinet Expansion-Gainers vs Losers

In any reshuffle of the ministry, there will be some who will cheer, some suffer heartburn.

When will we say No to Union General Budget?

Indian Fiance Minister Arun Jaitley will move the second General Budget on 28th February 2015.

Showing posts with label Economics-Indo-US IPR issues.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economics-Indo-US IPR issues.. Show all posts

Thursday 27 November 2014

India-US IPR War Awaits Obama, Modi Mediation

Business Economic & services Team (BEST)

              India -US IPR War Awaits  Obama  Modi Mediation

  A lot of debate, informed and ill - informed,  is happening on the India-US stand off in the IPR regime. There are accusations and counter accusations from both countries. Happily, the severest of the criticisms from either side are couched in diplomatic niceties, unlike the bilateral talk between India and Pakistan, where the words and phrases are intimidating and used by both sides to hit each other below the belt.

The latest to join the fray is Intel, with a clear warning that India should protect the trade secrets, ostensibly telling that the findings of their research laboratory situated in Bangalore should be protected from theft either by their own employees or by the regulatory authorities, who can stealthily divulge the secrets when mandatory filings are made. If one wants to read in between the lines, the allegation is very serious. It has two imports. One, the government is soft on those who commit the theft. Instead of sending the thief to bird (jail), they seem to have a field day by not invoking criminal proceedings against them. The second allegation is more sinister and that they openly proclaim that they do not have any faith in the credibility of the the Indian regulatory system, which tends to leak out the research findings, which can be  worth billions of dollars.

Intel is one among the long array of complainants of the IPR regime in India. A few days back, pharmaceutical companies have made similar allegations, followed  by electronics and telecom majors. Thankfully, two important segments, which are happy with Indian IPR regime are food processing and aviation sectors. It seems that they have  informed the USTR their appreciation and satisfaction about India's IPR regime in writing to USTR.
Now let us analyze why all on a sudden the Indian media is agog with stories on IPR, some of them seem to give the impression to the discerning  readers that they  are   outright  plants by vested interests. ( I refrain from telling  that they are planted by the companies themselves). The US companies feel that the forthcoming  visit t of  President Obama will provide an ideal platform for thrashing out the rough edges in the India's IPR regime.

In the given milieu, what  happening is inadequate orchestration of India's concerns on IPRs. There is a real threat from the US by misappropriating India's traditional knowledge and copy rights on certain segments like music, entertainment etc. It is being said that the Bollywood films and music are freely available in the grey market in the US. Also, medicinal properties of Indian herbs and plants, contained in the ancient books of India are used widely by the US companies to evolve new medicines, which are marketed widely.

It is significant to note that  the   assurances that are coming forth from the Indian authorities are vague and are couched in hyperbolas. For instance, the stock answer from the official sources in India against the unilateral decisions imposed by the US is that the issue would be discussed at the Innovation & Creativity Focus Group, set up between the two countries and a decision would be taken only after that . Some of the social activists have expressed the opinion that  the government was buckling under the US pressure and  threatened that any amendments to the IPR Act would have severe backlash.
There is no denial that there will be irritants in a dynamic and growing  trade relationship. These have to be addressed and resolved  in the spirit of give and take. India has a lot of concerns while doing business with the US. The foremost is the visa issues. The second issue is relating to large amount of unclaimed money vested with the US by way of  social security tax imposed on Indians who have short stay in the US. The third issue is the one relating to transfer of state-of-the-art technologies to India. Across the discussion table, these issues have to be discussed along with the US concerns  and agreement arrived.

Sunday 23 November 2014

US IPR Group's Meeting with Indian Higher Judiciary Thwarted-Does it Augur Well?


   Business Economics & Services Team (BEST)              



 US IPR Group's Meeting with Indian Higher Judiciary Thwarted-Does it  Augur Well?

   The raging debate today is whether the pressure groups are allowed to meet the judiciary to explain their  views. The case in point is the effort of the US IP body -Intellectual Property Owners' Association -to meet the higher judiciary -Delhi High Court judges and the Intellectual Property  Appellate Board(IPAB) was postponed presumably because of the pressure exerted by  activist groups  in India  consisting of  patients groups, social and health activists and lawyers. The IP group from the US  has already met the officials deling with IP related issues in the government and is reported to have aired their views and perceptions about the working of IP legislation in India, the pitfalls and how they can be toned up to encourage flow of state-of-the -art technologies to India.

A lot of views have expressed in open for and against such meetings of pressure groups  with  the higher judiciary.A shade of Indian public opinion feels that such meetings are healthy since the industry representatives will be able to explain to the judiciary their side of the concern. Having regard to the fact that IP laws and rules are relatively of recent origin in India, they feel that such high level interactions will enable the judiciary to keep abreast of the latest thinking on the issues governing the laws. It is a  fact that   many in the higher judiciary  were  not sufficiently oriented or grounded in such laws during their  days in the law school. The same is the case with application of economic laws to legal conundrums. A large part of laws governing competition, anti-dumping, taxes, etc. have strong economic base. For instance, the methodology for measuring the injury in an anti-dumping case is purely on the basis of economic  calculations based on econometric models.

The new entrants to the judicial service or the new advocates passing out from the known law schools, undergoing the five year integrated course may be aware of  such techniques and postulates. But such people reaching the higher layers of judiciary may take some more time. In the given situation, there is no harm in allowing the existing people in the judiciary to pick up some knowledge through interactions either with the specific interest groups or taking part in seminars and workshops held in other places. I would go a step further in suggesting that the relatively younger judges should be given sabbatical leave for honing up their skills in areas where they did not get any orientation during their law school days.Another proposal worth considering is calling social activists also for such interactions, provided that the deliberations are free from verbal attacks on each other.

Understandably, there is a mistrust between social activists and the judiciary. Perhaps, this could be more on account of the lack of interface between the two. Social activists often quote the Novartis case decided in 2011, when a judge had to acquiesce himself when it was pointed out that he attended a seminar or workshop  abroad mostly funded by the pharmaceutical major was a sponsor. There is a solution for obviating such unsavory occurrences by state sponsoring such trips of the judges. The entrie expenses have to be borne by the state.
Undeniably, IPR issues will occupy a significant quantum of court time in the coming years. Awareness about patents, trademarks, copyrights etc. are gradually percolating to the grassroots. Pharma companies are not alone in their fight against the Indian IPR regime. Of late, electronics and telecom companies from the US have aired their concern  about the indiscriminate  use of compulsory licensing  and data protection. They are also taking their stand for a higher period of IPR protection in India. In the given environs, our judges should be oriented in these specialized laws and at the same time  reasonable measures should be taken to ward off the perception that the judiciary will be pressurized to take lenient measures, if  interactions take place between judiciary and the pressure groups.